2-State Solution for Israel?
This UN Resolution for Israel has the right motives
but it will create another problem.
it appears that this resolution was fast-tracked,
meaning to say it is being done in haste.
In so many times I did mention in this site
that the crux of the problem is this:
the UN created the state of Israel
right smack dab in the land of Palestine
without defining its borders.
As a result, Israel continues to expand its area
via the construction of settlements for Israel.
In time, the region which the Palestinians
claim as their territory is getting smaller
because Israel continues to build settlements.
The Un hesitated to approve the creation of
a Palestinian state.
Oftentimes it
throws the problem backstage.
This new resolution attempts to compensate for the
neglect of the Palestinian problem
but its approval still does not prevent
the construction of Israeli settlements.
There will still be no defined borders.
Instead of approving a resolution for two-states in the region,
the UN should simply correct itself and put down borders.
As a consequence of fixed borders,
the implication is that the state of Israel
is confined to a limited territory,
and what is left after this is Palestinian territory.
There would then be the automatic formation of the state of Palestine
and the expansion of Israel is ended.
In other words,
let the territory define the state
and not the state define its borders.
Now, for the umpteenth time,
DEFINE THE BORDERS OF ISRAEL.