American Politics

The Texas Disaster

Who or what is really to blame for this debacle?

The Power Grid?

The state government?

The green Project?

Or what else?

Whatever it is, there is no sense arguing about it.

People should shut up.

Lashing at one another will not solve the problem.

The Texans are suffering.




There goes the banana tree plant—


I did say that whatever happens to the impeachment trial

the Republican Party would be in chaos.

More so when Trump promises to proceed with

what he has in mind.

People just got more scared.

More so with the minority groups.

After all they voted down Trump.

Him and his white supremacist supporters

now look upon the minority groups with condescension

and even vengeance.

A whole lot of those senators who voted to acquit Trump.

have inalienable ties with him.

They owe him their positions in politics and would never have

secured any other line of work asides from politics,

Serves them right. 

Now the banana Republican Party will sink with 

hostilities among its members.

It will not be a surprise

if there will be 

a party within the party.

As for Trump, he may now

claim that he belongs to history.

(or what’s  left of him after the IRS)

(better for the minority groups to start arming themselves)


Congress VS. Parliament

We now witness the sad story

of Congress being attacked by a mob

incited by the Head of the Government.

This could not happen

in a Parliamentary form of government

where the head of the government,

the Prime Minister,

is actually confronted

by the opposition party

inside the Parliament.

The PM will surely not incite a mob

to attack the Parliament

where he also sits.

Two thumbs up

and a skip of the rope for Parliament.

(more ills coming up)

The Republican Quandary

And so, after going thru the motions

of defending Trump,

the defense team now faces a Senate approval

of allowing witnesses on the stand.

These witnesses that

The House Impeachment Managers will call

would be those who would declare that

Trump did not incite them

on a mere “peaceful” protest only

and not a door and glass-breaking riot.

After all, Trump is already disowning them

as a mob that he did not incite.

The quandary of the witnesses is actually

a Republican quandary,

The party is now being labeled as a white supremacist

fascist party by none other than the minority groups,

or those groups that actually voted down Trump.

As I said,

whatever happens, the damage has been done!

Unless the Republicans

 disentangle themselves

of Trump and his white supremacists,

the whole country will be thrown into a struggle

between the white supremacists

and the minorities.

The Republican Rigodon

And so, with no one sturdy shoulder to lean to,

the Republicans start a rigodon of no fixed partners.

it’s a shame.

The one leader they put up as President

messed up the country

and their pride, mostly,

when the Trump rioters went after them, too.

And now the infighting in the US Congress

has made the place more exciting to behold

than the brawling in the Japanese Diet.

The Republicans may need one clean,

sterilized somebody to raise the standard of unity.

Otherwise, a third political party may arise

from the melee.

(next : weapons)


i will throw you a curv-ini

hope you can catch it.

It will be in multi-linguini

and some of it is tabingi.

Some presidente I forget who,

is deadly-determinado to prove

le electione is kaput because he knows

it was rigged so he would win.

El vittorio bandera is supposed to be his

nada con duda,

Bringing to mind some certain Navalny,

despues being wined and dined en allemagna

but presently under le carabinieri for being

drunk with something ala morphini.

El peboretissimo amigo of both el presidente 

and Navalny whose name is Giuliani,

a name to ring Paganini’s La campanella

little bells on Three Kings Day of Enero,

the day of Combat,

comes out stronger than espresso

to sabe andale, andale a kapitolyo.

I do not know whether you can make heads or tails

of this script I just scribbled under the influence.

If it did, boy, you’re good!


Quo Vadis Republicans

Your party is sinking,


where do you go from here?

You have been duped.

You are made to believe that

the election was stolen

and you are not even told how?

Your inalienable ties with Trump

and the Aryan Supremacists

have stifled your tongues

and you look bewildered.

You have yet to realize that whatever

 vote you make 

on this second impeachment trial

will not change anything.

The important vote was in the

first impeachment trial

the result of which started the demise

of your party.

You should have your party renamed 

the Banana Republican Party

or more descriptively

the Nationalist Republican Party.


Can Trump Pardon Himself?

Referring to his upcoming

second impeachment trial,

Trump can pardon only a person who is guilty.

(by common sense)

Now, if he is found guilty by this trial,

he is impeached

and therefore he loses the presidency

and consequently his powers to pardon.

Get it?

Going Bananas

The Republican Party

may now be officially called

the Banana Republican Party.

Poor Losers

Rabble rousers

ugly Americans

make America  great

in riots and street protests.

Freedom of Expression

is their weapon.

Brown Shirts

is their uniform.

They have so much time on their hands.

They should work to harvest bananas

in July.



America The Beautiful


America, The Beautiful

O beautiful for spacious skies,
For amber waves of grain,
For purple mountain majesties
Above the fruited plain!
America! America!
God shed His grace on thee
And crown thy good with brotherhood
From sea to shining sea!

O beautiful for pilgrim feet,
Whose stern, impassioned stress
A thoroughfare for freedom beat
Across the wilderness!
America! America!
God mend thine every flaw,
Confirm thy soul in self-control,
Thy liberty in law!


I have yet to find in this hymn

the contribution that the American people

give to the beauty of America. 

Trump’s Disinfectant

It seems that they have misinterpreted,

and took out of context, 

what Trump is saying.

He was merely musing,

giving his opinion on what may help

in formulating a cure for Covid-19.

His mistake was—-he forgot to turn off the microphone

so that everybody thought he was giving the order to

make the cure using disinfectants.

The disinfectant is based on chlorine which kills the virus.

Chlorine kills any virus,

It also kills people.

Chlorine has to be modified and combined with other

chemicals to make it safe for people to take.

Sodium is the best chemical to combine with chlorine

because the product becomes salt, the common table salt.

But chlorine has to be modified further

to put into a person’s body to  kill viruses.

He was on the right track, though,

but he still has to make more tracks on this matter.

Now Trump is embattled,

fighting two fronts at one time.

One front is against the Covid-19,

a virtually unknown and uncontrollable virus.

The other front is against his own people,

who uses the Constitution as an excuse to be disobedient.

He is facing overwhelming numbers from all counts.

Russian Interference?

The US Intelligence,

whoever they may be,

claims that Russia is preparing

to help Trump get re-elected.


Putin knows

that if Trump gets re-elected,

whether with Russian interference

or none at all,

the Russia-Russia-Russia ignominy

will be pronounced louder than before.

Best production Award

And the award for best production goes to

The Republicans

for producing the monster



Joe Biden

Former US Vice-President Joe Biden

displays how much experience he has

that would make him eligible to

be nominated as Presidential candidate.



Website Up Again

How long has it been?


Some people sure are mad about the

posts that I have been busy with.

My fault.

I should have had two desktops for backup.


Israel Peace Plan : The Carrot

Peace Plan.mp4

Peace Plan.mpg

Israel dangles the carrot in the Israel-Palestine problem

And the carrot is : A Palestinian state

From the Palestinian side, Israel is occupying Palestinian land

under the auspices of the UN Western nations.

There has been no borders defined within which Israel is

limited to establish settlements.

 Israel  manages to  evict  Palestinians from  their  land

so that Israeli settlements can be erected.

As a result, the Palestinians are scattered

away from the lands they had owned before.

Palestine must have an authority to reorganize its people.

A statehood is then dangled to the Palestinians to keep them quiet.

From the Israel side, the Palestinians have been troublesome

and that to prevent them from obliterating the Israelis

with an organized military force, the Palestinians must be

under Israeli control.

The proposed Peace Plan promises to get the Palestinian region

developed  BEFORE statehood is given.

The requirements laid down for statehood, however,

is too rigid and is considered impossible to achieve

even by other developed countries.

It has been concluded by the Arabs

that this promised statehood will

never be conferred and remains as the carrot.

I personally agree that this peace plan humiliates the Palestinians

and is devised to attain a status quo.

I would suggest that

first, borders should be defined under the auspices of the UN.

Second, Elections be made under the auspices of the UN.

Third, Statehood be confirmed under the auspices of the UN.

Fourth, negotiations be made between Israel and Palestine

under the auspixces of the UN for transfer of authority

and offices.

Fifth, Israel should treat Palestine a sovereign nation.

Never they mind about Palestinian progress as there will be

Iran, Turkey, China, and Russia to help the Palestinians.

As a final note : Israel has kept the statehood carrot dangling

over the Palestinians because Israel is scared that the Arabs

will rally to obliterate Israel.

This is mere Paranoia!


Debate for Bolton to Speak



Most probably Smiling Jack Bolton may say

some things which are not wriien

in his book.

Those things may be the clincher!



Day 2 Questions










Questions Day 1













John Bolton

Smiling Jack Bolton

is living up to expectations

in that he will be the game-changer.

My epithet exactly.

Trump’s assessment of Bolton is accurate.

But what Bolton writes is also accurate.

However, it should be noted

that both Bolton and Trump

are vindictive.

Was Bolton fired,

or did he bolt the ranks?

Da Prof Fumbles

Trimmed proper from head to foot

Prof Alan Dershowitz proclaimed that he is not connected

to the Trump Impeachment Team and afterwards hammered

the House Managers for being against Trump.

Listening to his harangue, I formed my conclusion that I

would not pine to be in his class for the simple reason that

he will not be able to teach me anything about law even if

I ain’t never been schooled in law at no time.

Listen closely now

because this post will be buried amongst the next

6,487 posts.

His favorite topic :the intentions of the Framers of the Constitution

and for a prof who declares that his passion is his love for the country

and its Constitution he failed to declare that a great portion of his

opinion are literally out of time and may not hold true today.

As a result he has promulgated a whole lot of graduates whose opinion

may be out of tune to the times.

The framers of the American Constitution

were attempting to form a republic with a government different from the

Parliamentary form obtained in England.

It can go without saying that the whole bunch of them were commoners,

those with nobility ties being forced to flee to what is now Canada.

The republic being formed has to have arms and a militia to the delight

of the now organized NRA, even if the arms constituted mere muskets,

gunpowder and lead balls.

This is a far cry from what is obtained now—-rpg, javelins, tanks, bombs,

planes and atom bombs.

Therefore, the commoners never envisioned anything like terrorists, tarrifs,

military aid, NATO, UN, blackmail, homicides,

homicides, homosexuals, abortions,

blackmail, bribery, hacking, and foreign interference.

But they did foresaw impeachment and made rules about the matter,

only thing is their vision was limited only at the time of musketry.

This is the point in time where DA trimmed prof delivered his lecture

on Impeachment.

He began with a sermon on the podium

against the House managers about them being ignorant

of his favorite subject : the Constitution of the olden times.

He said that Congress should not be above the law,

proceeding afterwards with items he wanted to alter in the

present procedures of the Constitution.

At this point, well-versed as he is in his beloved Constitution,

he failed to realize that to the Congress belongs the right

to amend the Constitution,

and it is the Congress that makes the laws

to be followed by everybody

including lecturers of outdated Constitutions.

He pointed out wrong interpretations of words

such as misdemeanor, maladministration,

high crimes, and so forth,

but he failed to suggest different words or terms

to replace these.

It is a standing rule for anybody and everybody who profess to

know more on any subject to be able to teach it

that if he is to point out something amiss in anything,

he should be able to suggest or recommend

a replacement and/or a solution to correct it.

He therefore assumed the posture of a mother-in-law on the podium

giving sermons on what is bad without mentioning what is good.

“I shall be short”

That’s what the man said.

I was not sure whether he was referring to his stature

or the length of time he is to harangue because he stayed

on the podium as if he were reluctant to surrender it.

At any rate, I shall cut my post short.

His last comment about the topic “Abuse of power”

was that the quid pro quo involving military aid,

which was legitimately approved by a bi-partisan Congress,

is not impeachable because the “abuse” term

was misinterpreted.

This was his great fumble, and the House Managers will

make a touchdown as a consequence of this.

To be impeachable, the quid pro quo should be committed

with the intention for personal aggrandizement.

Speaking of Intentions, now this was his greatest fumble.

While expounding with an almost vehement effort on the intentions

of the framers of the Constitution,

he all but left out the factor of “intention”

from the rest of his lecture.

This is the most important feature in the Constitution.

In fact it is the soul of the Constitution—the intention, the purpose

by which the republic is formed and organized.

After all, intention actually differentiates

between a First-Degree murder

from a Second-Degree Murder,

personal from political.

INTENTION—before and after the act,

will determine whether Trump

committed an Abuse of Power or not.

One cannot read the mind of Trump as regards his intentions,

 however, this can be deduced by his actions

before and after the commission.

Ask the cops, they know.

Don’t ask the Prof, he doesn’t.


Executive Privelege

I repeat,

the President cannot invoke Executive Privilege

if he has already admitted that he has done something wrong

in his administration.

He has no immunity against any charge related to his

wrongdoing and therefore he should cooperate with

the House who represents the people of the United States.

Justifying The Misdemeanor

AS I said, the end does not justify the means.

As expected, Burisma comes into the picture

as if revealing somebody else’s crime justifies one’s own crime.

The Trump defense did not specify Hunter Biden or Joe Biden.

Just Burisma.

It appears that Humter Biden is being paid by Burisma

some excessive amount even with him not having an

idea of what the work is supposed to be.

I say—isn’t this a common practice in the corporations in America?

Directors are paid humongous salaries for doing nothing.

They should have heard of Iacocca by now, haven’t they?

And then comes the preparatory build-up of Bagman Ghouliani.

Isn’t he the one suspected of bribing Siokin for the “material” about

Hunter Biden with the money coming from part of the military aid?

If so, the charge now changes to BRIBERY.

Anyway, what is the fuss all about now?

Joe Biden might not even win the primary( heheheh).

Common Sense

Celebrated impeachment lawyer Ken Starr

may not have any reason to celebrate at all.

In Trump’s defense, he elaborated on the Constitution

and history in maybe the effort to confuse those minions

to decide from the state of bewilderment.

A lot of the principles promulgated in 1876 do not apply now.

This is one effective strategy to use against people who

are not cognizant of what Starr is really talking about.

In this case it would be best to disregard what has been

narrated so far and just use common sense.

For instance, Impeachment may be used as a weapon

IF the guilt or misdemeanor of the defendant is not known.

Trump’s guilt has been widely publicized and that he was

actually caught red-handed.

So the Trial is actually a Check on Trump

and not a weapon against Trump.

Impeachment, in such a case as this,

becomes part and parcel

of the System of Checks and balances.

Ken Starr mistakes this trial for the Impeachment of the Trump

as a weapon by the Democrats for use in the next elections.

No, he should have the common sense to add

that if the President admits he made a misdemeanor,

then he should be punished.

Plainly taken straight from the noggin.

He also dealt with the  no response given to the subpoenas

saying that these should be passed thru the Courts.

He dealt with this subject in a miniature time frame,

without discussing what check and balance item

in the Constitution would refer to the judges

who  withhold their decisions for months at an end.


and paraphrasing Starr,

 the System of Checks and Balances

refer only to the relations  between

the Executive Branch and Congress.

The Judicial Branch rules over all.

Boy, do the Americans ever need a Judge Roy Bean now, 

(off the bat)

Two-Faced Lecturers


Even though they are not part of Trump’s Defense,

they will be allowed to speak at the Impeachment Trial.

One of them is the two-faced professor Alan D.

He will say:

“I did not say that I was wrong before

I am only saying that

now I am more correct”