SSS

Social Insurance Contributions….

 

 The SSS is a social security insurance agency.

So is the GSIS.

These are supposed to accept cash contributions from people who are employed by witholding a portion of their wages. These contributions are channeled thru the employers who then remit these amounts the the secial security insurance outfits. There comes the problem when the employer fails to remit these contributions to the insurance outfit. The contributors will not be able to avail of the benefits from the insurance company.

It should be remembered that these social security insurance agencies are, by definition, insurance companies and as such will therefore invest the contributors’ money and thereafter return them in full at a predetermined time with interest. So the employer should pay interest for the time money is witheld.

If the employer fails to remit these contributions on time then they are breaking the law and are therefore liable for court action. If the employer happens to be a municipality or a city, then actions aginst this employer should be done thru the local government, specifically thru the Department of Local Government.

As of now, GSIS have no teeth to penalize erring local government entities but the DILG has. Offhand I would say, garnish some wages or wage portions of the employers/employees.***

I would blame also the GSIS for sitting on their haunches and waiting for things to happen by holding back its services to the public.

The GSIS should be able to communicate with the local government Treasurers, no? After all, it is the local government Treasurers that affect any transfer of money.

***pag hindi mabilis pa sa alas ocho after the garnishment

The pension of Col Russell Williams

The Canadian courts are now deciding on whether to allow the convicted colonel to draw his pension from the government.

Personally I believe he is entitled to receive this pension.

The money is his. The said pension had been dutifully contributed to, from legally earned wages, and should be rightfully his. This pension should be treated like his savings.

Incidentally, this ruling should also apply to Filipinos who have contributed to a pension fund. Thsy should get their money back even though how small the amount of the pension and how small the amount that was contributed to the fund. It is their money, not the SSS nor the GSIS. There should be no such thing as money forfeited because of a crime committed, as long as the money had been legally earned.

Right now, a small amount contributed to the SSS is forfeited even if there is also some amounts contributed to the GSIS by the same person. Both contributions are forfeited.

This is highway robbery!

ALSO, REMEMBER that the forfeiture of his retirement pension is the single cause of why Captain Mendoza went bananas to hold hostage a tourist bus.