SHRAPNEL OFF THE WALL

Same Sex Union, the way out

This public declaration approving of the same sex marriage is not good politics.

There are more voters from straight people than others.

Same-sex marriage can be legalized if this were called instead, Same-sex Union

In so doing it will still have the same attributes and responsibilities of marriage, but preserves the sanctity of the term “marriage”.

Anyway, the legal and specific details will be laid down by each individual state, and may differ as per the preference of the local voters.

And therefore, even if federal government will recognize the validity of same-sex union, the legal ramifications of such a union will be the responsibility of each state.

In other words, the federal government will  neither agree nor frown upon same-sex union.

It’s the call of state legislature.

Aftere all, don’t they call the federal government as THE UNION and not THE MARRIAGE?

Same-sex Marriage

Same-sex Marriage

There is no such thing as same-sex marriage, or even same-sex union for that matter.

Nuts and bolts fasten beautifully together. This is what we may call a union.

Bolts do not go together with other bolts, and one can go nuts trying to fasten nuts to other nuts.

A male coupling with another male may be likened to the pairing of two bolts and four nuts. No union there.

Heterosexuals, or people of different sexes, have been patient with the demonstrations of homosexuals regarding what they term as sexual preferences. These have been ignored and dismissed as oddities, so much so that the homos are getting carried away. They misinterpret the lack of concern by the heteros as an approval of their scandalous exhibitions.

The homos are free to do what they want. This is free country, as long as they do not infringe on the freedom of the others. They chose to call their same sex coupling as marriage.

Now they have gone too far. The term marriage is, for the heterosexuals, a sacred undertaking with strict unalterable requirements and solemn rites. It appears that by calling their same sex couplings as marriage, the homos have chosen to disregard the requirements of marriage and at the same time attempt to stay within the confines of marriage by retaining the solemn rites of marriage. It is as if the homos have chosen to abandon the heterosexual group while striving with tooth and nail to belong to the same group. What-the-hey, they threw away the cake and now they want the icing!

It would have been easier for everybody concerned had the homosexuals established their  own religion, you know, like Henry VIII or Brigham Young? By then they could call their partnering anything they want.

Of course, religion or no religion, the gays and the lesbians still have to prove that their genders are the third and fourth genders in existence.