The Recount Comedy

The awkward American election dance

has now been more than laughable.

The votes in some states are now to be

re-counted by hand

for no more apparent a reason

than the whim of a losing candidate,

who admits that she wants a re-count

just to prove that anybody can demand a re-count.

She raised the money to pay for the re-count,

money which is more than enough to pay for the re-count.

Question is, who gets the surplus of the money

after expenses?

It is improbable that the vote tally could be hacked.

 Thereby it is improbable that the results would be wrong.

To change the election results, the “hacking”

should be undertaken federally where the results would be final

and there would be a single computer to hack.

Tampering , if any, should have been done locally,

and in all the voting sites.

This would be impossible to do because

the large number of voting terminal machines

make hacking prohibitive.

Furthermore, inspectors for both parties

should be present to oversee the voting

and the final count within the precinct.

These inspectors should sign

for the validity of the count.

Also, the manufacturers of these terminals

do make final extensive tests for accuracy

and thereafter the machines are locked.

Otherwise, the manufacturers of the terminals

would be sued for vote tampering.

If tampering is done by changing electronic parts,

then further testing of the terminals would prove

that it has been done so.

It does take common sense

which sore losers do disregard.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.